Skip to content
LongevityNo human studies cited

SG1002

SG1002, oral hydrogen sulfide prodrug

Written by Reviewed Sep 2026

Also known as: Hydrogen sulfide donor, H2S prodrug

Hydrogen sulfide is required for the lifespan benefits of dietary restriction in several species, so a donor was an unusually well-motivated candidate. It failed at three different starting ages.

Overview

The case for testing this was among the strongest in the whole programme. Hydrogen sulfide is a gaseous signalling molecule, and work across yeast, worms, flies and mice found it necessary for the lifespan and stress-resistance benefits of dietary restriction. Restricting protein or methionine raises endogenous hydrogen sulfide production, and blocking that production abolishes the benefit. If a single molecule mediated dietary restriction, this was the leading candidate.

SG1002 is an oral prodrug designed to raise circulating hydrogen sulfide, developed for heart failure.

The Interventions Testing Program tested it and found no significant lifespan increase in either sex. The coverage record notes it was tested at three different starting ages, which matters because a common defence of a null is that treatment began too late.

Mechanism of action

An orally bioavailable prodrug that releases hydrogen sulfide, raising plasma sulfide and thiosulfate. Hydrogen sulfide signals largely through persulfidation, adding a sulfur to reactive cysteine residues on target proteins, which modifies their activity. Downstream effects include vasodilation, mitochondrial modulation, activation of the NRF2 antioxidant response and improved endothelial function. Endogenous production comes from cystathionine gamma-lyase and cystathionine beta-synthase, the enzymes that are upregulated by methionine and protein restriction.

Human evidence

Early human work in heart failure. No ageing endpoints and no lifespan or healthspan data in people.

  • Developed and studied as an oral hydrogen sulfide donor in heart failure, where endogenous sulfide is depleted.
  • No published human ageing, healthspan or longevity result was located.
  • The mechanistic case rests on animal and invertebrate work showing hydrogen sulfide is required for dietary restriction benefits.

What this does not tell you: The human record is small and concerns heart failure rather than ageing. The lifespan null is in mice. Because the compound was tested at three different starting ages and failed at all of them, the usual objection that treatment began too late does not apply here, which makes this null stronger than most.

Reading the research record

This is the most informative null in the batch, because the hypothesis behind it was the best. Hydrogen sulfide is not a speculative longevity mechanism; it is a molecule shown to be necessary for the lifespan effects of dietary restriction across multiple species. The obvious inference was that supplying it directly might reproduce some of those effects.

It did not, at three separate starting ages. The most likely explanation is the one this pattern usually has: a signalling molecule being required for an intervention does not mean supplying it reproduces the intervention. Dietary restriction changes hundreds of things at once, and hydrogen sulfide being a necessary link in the chain says nothing about whether it is sufficient on its own. That distinction, necessary against sufficient, accounts for a large share of failed longevity supplements.

The Interventions Testing Program is run by the National Institute on Aging at three independent sites, The Jackson Laboratory, the University of Michigan and the University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio. It uses UM-HET3 mice, a genetically heterogeneous four-way cross, so a result cannot be an artefact of one inbred strain. Compounds are fed in the diet, both sexes are tested, cohorts are large enough to detect roughly a 10 percent lifespan change, and results are analysed by log-rank for median survival and by the Wang-Allison test for maximum lifespan. Its nulls are published alongside its positives. That combination of features does not exist anywhere else in ageing research, which is why a null here means considerably more than a null from a single laboratory.

The evidence, charted

Fig. 1 · evidence composition

0of 1 citation (0%) is in people

Every citation cited here is Animal work; no other study type is cited on this page. This count is of our own citation list and understates any literature larger than the sources we cite.

Fig. 2 · evidence over time

Every citation here was published in 2024.

Too few distinct publication years on this page to plot as a timeline.

Fig. 3 · legal status at a glance

Approved in 2 of 4, prescription route in 0, not approved in 2. A jurisdiction's classification is a regulatory fact, not a verdict on the science; see Legal status below for the full text and any notes.

Fig. 4 · dose response

No human dose response curve exists

We draw this figure where the data supports it. For this compound in humans it does not, so the panel stays empty rather than borrowing an animal curve and implying it transfers.

Awaiting a dose ranging studyProducing one takes a trial that gives different amounts to different groups and measures the difference. Nobody has funded that for this compound.

Key studies & citations

  • Animal2024

    Astaxanthin and meclizine extend lifespan in UM-HET3 male mice; fisetin, SG1002, dimethyl fumarate, mycophenolic acid, and 4-phenylbutyrate do not

    Interventions Testing Program. SG1002, described as a hydrogen sulfide donor, did not increase lifespan significantly at the dose and method of administration tested, in either sex.

    GeroScience

Frequently asked questions

Can hydrogen sulfide reproduce the benefits of fasting or protein restriction?

Not on this evidence. Hydrogen sulfide is required for dietary restriction to extend lifespan in several species, and supplying it directly did not extend lifespan in mice at any of three starting ages. Being necessary for an effect is not the same as being sufficient to produce it.

Does the three-start-age detail matter?

Yes, and it makes this null unusually strong. The standard objection to a failed lifespan trial is that treatment started too late to work. Testing three starting ages and failing at all of them removes that explanation.

Should I take a hydrogen sulfide supplement?

There is no evidence supporting it for ageing and one rigorous negative result against it. If the underlying interest is the dietary restriction pathway, the intervention with actual evidence is the dietary restriction itself, which this site covers in the fasting and protein sections.

Related compounds