Skip to content

Wim Hof breathing and breathwork ยท what the trials measured

What Wim Hof breathing has actually been measured to do

The famous result is a laboratory one: trained volunteers given a bacterial toxin had a damped inflammatory response, and the breathing, not the cold, drove it. Outside the laboratory the Wim Hof trials are small and mixed, and the one randomised trial of daily practice on heart and mood measures found nothing. The documented harm is breath holding after fast breathing, above all in water.
16 sources, each resolved on PubMed or read at the regulator or society that published it. None of the 5 goals meets the rule for a stronger record, which is printed below. 3 are thin, null, or ahead of the marketing. Learning only. No clinic, device or brand is named.

Plate 46

Breath record

What a study breathed

hold6090100%

16

Sources on the page

5

Goals in people

Saturation fell to 60 percent at the end of the holds in one study.

On this page. Counts, not a grade and not a ranking.

No goal on this page meets the rule for a stronger record. The rule is printed above the goals, and the count it read is printed under each one.

Read this first

Educational use only. This page is not medical advice. Breathing patterns and session lengths are what a study ran, not a practice for you. Hyperventilation followed by breath holding can cause fainting without warning, and in or near water it can kill. Epilepsy, heart disease and pregnancy are questions for your own clinician. Aaron Cuha is a coach, not a doctor.

Educational use only. This database summarizes published research and is not medical advice. Where a dose appears it is a record of what a trial or clinic ran, or what people describe doing, with its source attached. Nothing here is a recommendation for personal use.

What it is

The Wim Hof Method combines three parts: a breathing pattern of rounds of fast, deep breaths followed by a breath hold after exhaling, cold exposure, and a meditation or commitment element. Its breathing part alone is sometimes studied as Wim Hof breathing; in the research it is called cyclic hyperventilation with breath retention.

Breathwork is the wider family: slow breathing, box breathing, cyclic sighing with long exhales, and fast high-ventilation practices like Wim Hof's. They do different things to blood chemistry, and the evidence for one does not transfer to another. This page keeps them apart.

The fast breathing blows off carbon dioxide, which makes the blood more alkaline, and the breath hold that follows lets oxygen fall. In one study, finger oxygen saturation reached 60 percent at the end of the holds. Those swings are the proposed mechanism, and the source of the main risk.

How it is thought to work

The proposed story is that the breathing deliberately triggers a surge of adrenaline, which damps the immune system's inflammatory response. That part was measured in a laboratory, in healthy men given a bacterial toxin. Whether it matters outside that laboratory is the open question.

Where the mechanism story is weak

Daily practice moved nothing measured

In 42 people randomised to 15 days of daily Wim Hof practice or control, heart rate, heart rate variability, blood pressure, arterial stiffness, stress, affect and vitality did not change.

No help before sprinting

In 15 runners, a Wim Hof breathing session before repeated sprints did not change power or fatigue, despite large changes in blood oxygen and carbon dioxide.

The meta-analysts urge caution

The authors of a breathwork meta-analysis that found lower stress also urge caution to avoid a miscalibration between hype and evidence, citing moderate risk of bias in most trials.

The dose words, and what a trial ran

Every number here is what a study ran, named beside it. None is a practice for a reader. Fast breathing and slow breathing are different techniques with different evidence, so the technique matters more than the minutes.

Cyclic hyperventilation with retention
Rounds of fast, deep breaths, then a breath hold after exhaling. The adolescent runners did three rounds a day, about 20 minutes. One study measured finger oxygen saturation at 60 percent at the end of the holds.
Cyclic sighing
Two inhales and a long exhale, emphasising the exhale. In the one-month remote study, 5 minutes a day of cyclic sighing improved mood more than mindfulness.
Slow breathing
Breathing well below the usual rate. Across 223 studies it raised heart rate variability linked to the calming branch of the nervous system. It is not what the Wim Hof Method does.
Training length
From one session before sprints, to 10 days of training in the toxin study, 15 days in the null trial, 29 days in the large semi-randomised study and 12 weeks in the multiple sclerosis pilot.

What a trial ran

Each row is a record from a paper. It is not a practice for you.

GoalWhoWhat the trial ranSource
Inflammation, laboratory12 trained and 12 untrained healthy men10 days of training in meditation, cyclic hyperventilation with retention and ice-cold immersion, then a bacterial toxin in a vein.PMID 24799686
Heart and mood42 participantsDaily Wim Hof practice for 15 days, against control.PMID 37845341
Wellbeing404 healthy adults29 days of the Wim Hof Method in person or remotely, against mindfulness meditation.PMID 41388053
MoodAdults in a remote randomised study5 minutes a day for a month of cyclic sighing, box breathing, cyclic hyperventilation with retention, or mindfulness.PMID 36630953
Sprinting15 amateur runners, crossoverOne Wim Hof breathing session before repeated sprints, against hyperventilation alone or normal breathing.PMID 34514386
Inflammatory spine disease24 people with axial spondyloarthritis8 weeks of breathing, cold and meditation added to usual care, against a waiting control.PMID 31790484

What studies in people found, by goal

Stronger records first. Nulls and marketing-ahead goals stay on the same page. Every card is people only; animal work is in its own section below. Nothing here is ranked against the others, and no clinic or device is recommended.

How the tier is decided, so you can check it against the counts printed under each one. Stronger: a clinical guideline or a medical society's indication list recommends it in a named setting, or a pooled analysis of randomised trials favours breathwork and the source rated the certainty moderate. Thin: the pooled result was null or went against breathwork for the goal as named, the source rated it very low, or nothing was pooled at all. Mixed: everything else, including a result that moved one measure and not another.

  1. Mixed, local, or early

    12 randomised trials pooled, 785 people; certainty not graded by the source; result mixed

    Stress, anxiety and mood. Breathwork in general lowered stress in pooled trials; Wim Hof trials split between small gains and nothing

    Who was studied

    A 2023 meta-analysis of 12 randomised trials and 785 adults across many breathwork styles, one of whose authors is a breath teacher. Then Wim Hof trials: 42 people for 15 days, 404 for 29 days, and 6 trained against 7 untrained expedition members. A one-month remote study compared four practices.

    Breathwork lowered self-reported stress (g = -0.35), anxiety and depressive symptoms against control. Exhale-focused cyclic sighing improved mood more than mindfulness. For Wim Hof practice, the 404-person study found greater momentary energy and clarity after sessions with minimal lasting change, the expedition group's depressive symptoms fell, and the 42-person randomised trial found no change in stress, affect or vitality.

    Setting in the evidence

    Daily practice at home, from 5 minutes to about 20 minutes.

    What this does not show

    That Wim Hof breathing beats other breathwork or meditation for stress. The pooled result is for breathwork broadly, and the slow and exhale-focused styles did at least as well.

  2. Mixed, local, or early

    223 studies pooled; certainty not graded by the source; result mixed

    Heart rate variability and blood pressure. Slow breathing raised heart rate variability across 223 studies; daily Wim Hof practice did not move it

    Who was studied

    A 2022 meta-analysis of 223 studies of slow breathing, and a randomised trial of 42 people doing daily Wim Hof practice for 15 days.

    Slow breathing raised heart rate variability during practice, right after a session and after weeks of practice. Daily Wim Hof practice changed none of heart rate, heart rate variability, blood pressure or arterial stiffness against control.

    Setting in the evidence

    Slow paced breathing in the pooled studies; Wim Hof breathing in the trial.

    What this does not show

    A heart benefit from Wim Hof breathing. The positive pooled result belongs to a different technique.

  3. Thin, null, or marketing ahead

    nothing pooled; certainty not graded by the source; no pooled result

    Inflammation and the immune response. A real effect in a laboratory toxin model; small pilots in inflammatory disease

    Who was studied

    Healthy men given a bacterial toxin in a vein: 12 trained and 12 untrained in 2014, and 48 in 2022, taught in the 2022 study by the method's creator or an independent trainer. Then 24 people with an inflammatory spine disease and 60 with multiple sclerosis, 43 analysed. A 2024 systematic review of eight trials did not pool them.

    After the toxin, trained men had higher IL-10, lower TNF-alpha, IL-6 and IL-8, and fewer flu-like symptoms; the breathing drove it, and cold training alone did not. In spine disease, ESR fell from 16 to 9 mm/hr and disease activity from 3.1 to 2.3, but CRP did not change. In multiple sclerosis, the Wim Hof arm lowered IL-17A and IL-18 about as much as an exercise and diet programme.

    Setting in the evidence

    Supervised training in breathing, cold and meditation, with the toxin given in hospital.

    What this does not show

    Fewer infections or better health in daily life. The toxin model is a short laboratory challenge, and the disease pilots were small, open-label and partly compared with no treatment.

  4. Thin, null, or marketing ahead

    nothing pooled; certainty not graded by the source; no pooled result

    Exercise performance. One session before sprints did nothing; 4 weeks did not change breathing during exercise

    Who was studied

    15 amateur runners in a crossover before repeated sprints, and 19 adolescent runners randomised to 4 weeks of daily practice or none.

    A breathing session before sprints did not change peak power, average power or fatigue. Four weeks of daily practice did not change breathing frequency, depth or ventilation during a graded exercise test. A 2024 systematic review called the exercise results mixed.

    Setting in the evidence

    Wim Hof breathing before exercise, or daily for 4 weeks.

    What this does not show

    Any performance gain.

  5. Thin, null, or marketing ahead

    nothing pooled; certainty not graded by the source; no pooled result

    Longevity and ageing. No study in the search measured ageing or lifespan

    Who was studied

    Nobody, for this goal. The closest is the 2024 systematic review of eight Wim Hof trials.

    The review found possible anti-inflammatory effects and mixed exercise results. None of its trials measured ageing.

    Setting in the evidence

    Not applicable.

    What this does not show

    Any lifespan or ageing benefit.

What studies in animals found, kept apart

No animal study of the Wim Hof Method, or of cyclic hyperventilation with breath holds as a practice, appeared in the search. This section is empty on purpose, so nobody fills the gap with a guess.

How to read this record

The best-known result is a laboratory model. A bacterial toxin in a vein is a controlled short challenge, and the method changed the response to it. That is a real finding about the nervous and immune systems, not evidence of fewer infections or less disease in daily life.

The breathing, not the cold, drove that result in the follow-up. The cold page has its own record.

Breathwork lowers self-reported stress in pooled trials, but those trials mix many styles, and slow or exhale-focused breathing did at least as well as fast breathing. The one randomised trial of daily Wim Hof practice on heart and mood measures was null.

The documented harm is specific: hyperventilating before a breath hold lets oxygen fall fast without the urge to breathe, which can cause fainting without warning, and in water, drowning.

A position, labelled as one

The blocks above are the studies. The block below is a judgment about what to do with them. It has to say where it goes past the measurements.

Aaron Cuhaโ€™s position

This is opinion, not a finding. Everything else on this page is the evidence.

Wim Hof breathing reliably raises adrenaline and damped the inflammatory response in a laboratory toxin model. Beyond that, its trials are small and mixed, the one randomised trial of daily practice on heart and mood found nothing, and slower breathing styles have stronger evidence for calm. Breath holding after hyperventilation can cause fainting, and in water it can kill.

The reasoning

  • In two toxin studies in healthy men, the second with 48, the breathing changed the inflammatory response, and cold alone did not.
  • In 42 people randomised to 15 days of daily practice, no heart, stress or mood measure changed.
  • The pooled stress result is for breathwork broadly, and slow breathing raised heart rate variability across 223 studies.
  • In Australian snorkelling deaths, 12 of 60 followed breath holding after hyperventilation.

Where this goes beyond the evidence

This position goes beyond the evidence in treating the laboratory result as not transferable: it is possible the same adrenaline response lowers inflammation in disease, and the small spine disease and multiple sclerosis pilots point that way. A large randomised trial in an inflammatory disease, against an active control, would settle it. It also generalises from short trials of 15 to 29 days; longer daily practice has not been tested in a randomised trial.

Who this is not for

Anyone practising in or near water, in a bath, or while driving; anyone with epilepsy, a fainting history, heart disease or pregnancy who has not asked their own clinician; and anyone who wants this page to replace one.

Aaron Cuha, who built this archive and reads the studies behind the pages. He is a coach, not a doctor, and no medical credential is claimed for him anywhere on this site. More about who writes this

Read the results this rests on

Who it is for, and who it is wrong for

For

  • Someone who does Wim Hof breathing and wants to know which claims come from a laboratory and which from daily life.
  • Someone choosing a breathing practice for stress, who should see that slower styles have at least as much evidence.

Wrong for

  • Anyone in or near water

    In 60 Australian snorkelling deaths, 12 followed breath holding after hyperventilation or on ascent, causing unconsciousness and then drowning.

  • Anyone with a fainting or seizure history

    In one study, oxygen saturation fell to 60 percent at the end of the breath holds. A diver who did the same on land, unsupervised, lost consciousness for a prolonged period.

  • Anyone expecting a heart benefit

    Daily practice for 15 days did not change heart rate variability or blood pressure in a randomised trial.

  • Anyone wanting a personal practice

    Breathing patterns and session lengths here are records of what a study ran. They are not instructions for your body.

Limits and safety, with the numbers

Fainting without warning

Hyperventilating before a breath hold lets oxygen fall fast before the urge to breathe arrives. In 15 runners, finger oxygen saturation fell to 60 percent at the end of the holds. A diver practising this on land, alone, lost consciousness and developed fluid on the lungs.

In supervised trials

In the spine disease trial, adverse events did not differ from control, and in the multiple sclerosis pilot the method was well tolerated. Both were supervised.

Where this sits in the archive

This site teaches a blood panel, protein and training before gadgets and practices. Breathwork does not move that order, though unlike the devices it costs nothing.

Disclosed both ways: the owner of this archive lists Wim Hof breathing in his own protocol at /my-protocols. That is a personal choice recorded there, not a finding on this page.

Nothing on this page is for sale. No seller wrote it, and no course, app or instructor is named or ranked.

Setups, not a shopping list

Four breathing styles that get grouped together. None is ranked.

Wim Hof Method

Fast breathing with breath holds, cold exposure and meditation, together.

Evidence match. The toxin studies, the spine disease and multiple sclerosis pilots, and the 404-person study.

Mismatch. Most results combine all three parts, so the breathing alone cannot always be separated.

Wim Hof breathing alone

Rounds of fast, deep breaths followed by a breath hold after exhaling.

Evidence match. The sprint and adolescent runner studies, and the breathing arm of the 2022 toxin study.

Mismatch. The performance results were null; the risk is the breath hold.

Cyclic sighing and box breathing

Long exhales, or equal counts of in, hold and out.

Evidence match. The one-month remote study, where cyclic sighing improved mood most.

Mismatch. One study, 5 minutes a day, remote.

Slow breathing

Breathing well below the usual resting rate.

Evidence match. The 223-study meta-analysis of heart rate variability.

Mismatch. Not what the Wim Hof Method does, and its result does not transfer to fast breathing.

What a breathing practice has to state before it can be compared with a study

  • Fast or slow breathing, and whether there are breath holds. The evidence and the risk differ between them.
  • Whether cold or meditation is combined with it, because most Wim Hof results are for the combination.
  • Where it is done. The documented deaths involve water, and fainting on land needs a safe place to fall.
  • The goal: a laboratory immune response, daily stress, heart measures or performance, since each has a different answer.

Claims this page will not make

Wim Hof breathing boosts your immune system.
It damped the inflammatory response to a bacterial toxin in a laboratory. That is a quieter immune response, not a stronger one, and no study here counted infections.
It lowers stress and improves mood.
Breathwork broadly lowered self-reported stress in pooled trials. The randomised trial of daily Wim Hof practice found no change in stress or affect.
It improves heart health.
Daily practice for 15 days did not change heart rate variability, blood pressure or arterial stiffness.
It boosts athletic performance.
A session before sprints did nothing for power or fatigue, and 4 weeks did not change breathing during exercise.
It floods the body with oxygen.
The breath hold lowers oxygen. Finger saturation reached 60 percent at the end of the holds in one study.
It is safe for anyone.
Breath holding after hyperventilation caused 12 of 60 snorkelling deaths in one Australian series, and fainting on land in a case report.

Questions people ask

What does Wim Hof breathing actually do?
It raises adrenaline during practice. In healthy men given a bacterial toxin in a laboratory, that went with a damped inflammatory response and fewer flu-like symptoms.
Does Wim Hof breathing reduce stress?
Breathwork in general lowered self-reported stress in pooled trials. The randomised trial of daily Wim Hof practice for 15 days found no change in stress, and slower breathing styles did at least as well elsewhere.
Is it the breathing or the cold?
In the 2022 follow-up, cold training alone did not change the inflammatory response; the breathing did, and cold enhanced it.
Is Wim Hof breathing dangerous?
The breath hold after fast breathing can cause fainting without warning, and in water it has caused drownings. The trials ran it under supervision; none tested it in water.
Does it increase oxygen?
No. The fast breathing lowers carbon dioxide, and the breath hold then lowers oxygen; one study measured finger saturation at 60 percent.
Is this a breathing programme?
No. Aaron is a coach, not a doctor, and this page reports what studies ran. It does not set a pattern, a duration or a schedule for anyone.

Sources

Knowledge stays free. No seller wrote this page. Every source below opens the record that was checked before the sentence was written, with what it found and who funded it.

Educational use only. This page is not medical advice. Breathing patterns and session lengths are what a study ran, not a practice for you. Hyperventilation followed by breath holding can cause fainting without warning, and in or near water it can kill. Epilepsy, heart disease and pregnancy are questions for your own clinician. Aaron Cuha is a coach, not a doctor.

Educational use only. This database summarizes published research and is not medical advice. Where a dose appears it is a record of what a trial or clinic ran, or what people describe doing, with its source attached. Nothing here is a recommendation for personal use.