No match scores
Peptide finder
Plate 11
Goal map
Find by outcome
36
Goal pages
1
Record
The short answer
Pick what you want to change. See every compound measured for it in people, most people first. Each one shows what the study found, and the failures are counted. 70 of 453 compounds here have no study in people of any kind.
- Compounds
- 453
- No study in people
- 70
How this ranks
No match scores
Other tools print a match percentage. Nobody measured those numbers. This page shows how many people each goal was measured in, and names the goals nobody has measured in a person.
A thin record in people is usually about who pays for trials. It is not a verdict on the compound.
What users report sits next to the trial count. It is never added into it.
What are you trying to change?
Pick as many as you like. The number on each one is how many people it has been measured in across the whole archive. So you can see where the evidence is before you choose.
Somebody handed you a stack. What is actually known about it?
Add what you are looking at. You get every goal those compounds have been measured for in people. Then you get the longer list of goals they have not.
Nothing picked yet. To see the point of this straight away, choose Tendon, ligament and injury healing. It is the reason BPC-157 sells, and no trial in people has ever measured it. What there is instead: lots of user reports, a study of the heel tendon in rats, tendon cells in a dish, and a clear reason no company will pay for the trial. All of that is on the page, kept apart and labeled.
How this is counted
Studies in people only. Animal and lab work never goes into this ranking, because your question was about a person.
A compound is listed for a goal only when a study on its own page names that goal and reports a result for it. Just naming it is not enough. Say a paper measures testosterone but reports a result about something else. That does not count as testosterone evidence. This tool made that mistake on its first run, and it no longer does.
People counts come from the study lines themselves, and when in doubt they count low. If a line gives no number, the study still counts as a study but adds nobody to the people count. Counts are never added up across compounds, because the same person can be in more than one trial.
The order is by how many people were measured. That is a fact about the evidence, not a judgement about the compound. It is the only order this site will defend. A compound at the top of a list is the most studied. That is not the same as the best.
Nothing here is advice. Nothing here tells you to take anything.