14 existing pages · beginner, then intermediate · not a course
A path through this archive, in the order a beginner would use it
Fourteen existing pages, not a new curriculum. Aaron is a coach, not your doctor. Nothing here diagnoses, treats, or prescribes, and no step tells you what to take or how much.
The competing product in this category is a gated lesson dump with no citations. This path is the opposite: every stop is a page this site already publishes, every number already lives on that page, and there is no badge at the end. If you only do the first six stops you will already know how to read a compound profile without being sold one.
Coach, not doctor
Educational research archive. Not medical advice. Aaron is a coach, not your doctor, and this path does not change that. It will not tell you to start, stop, inject, or cycle anything. Linked pages that mention a dose are quoting a trial, a label, or what people describe doing, with the source attached.
Educational use only. This database summarizes published research and is not medical advice. Where a dose appears it is a record of what a trial or clinic ran, or what people describe doing, with its source attached. Nothing here is a recommendation for personal use.
Beginner · 6 stops
Who wrote it, how to move around, how the numbers are made, why trials are missing, then one thick human record and one thin one. That is enough to read the rest of the site without being misled by a grade or a forum thread.
- 01
Start with who wrote this, and the limit of that
Aaron Cuha is a coach, not a physician. No clinical credential is claimed for him anywhere on this site, on purpose. Read the safety and scope card so you know whose voice you are hearing before you read a compound page.
This is not a medical intake and it does not replace a clinician you actually have.
- 02
How the archive is laid out
If you know a name, search. If you only know a problem, that is the more common case: Goals lists the outcomes people actually type. Compound pages put human evidence first and keep animal and cell work in a labelled place of their own.
- 03
How a page is built, and what the numbers mean
Inclusion rules, live identifier checks against PubMed and the trial registries, nulls published as findings, and the rule that first-hand reports are never added into a grade. A band on a card is arithmetic over counted studies, not a verdict on whether you should use the compound.
The grade always prints the sum beside the word. If a page cannot show that arithmetic, it is not a grade this site will stand behind.
- 04
Why so many trials never happen
An unpatentable molecule rarely attracts a trial sponsor. A thin human record is often an economic fact rather than a finding that the molecule does nothing. Read this before treating absence as a verdict.
- 05
Read a compound with large human trials
Semaglutide is approved and heavily studied. Use it to see how a page looks when the human record is thick: participant counts, missed endpoints, and funding, with animal work kept apart.
Doses on that page are what trials or labels ran. They are a record, not a recommendation for you.
- 06
Read a famous peptide with a thin human record
BPC-157 is widely discussed and has far less human evidence than the attention suggests. The page has to hold both facts without turning either into a verdict. The first-hand reports sit in their own labelled block and do not raise the evidence band.
Intermediate · 8 stops
First-hand reports counted on their own, the FAQ including the absences, injecting and cycling without invented schedules, then the finder, the owner's signed order of operations, named sellers, and the calculator that never suggests a dose.
- 07
What people report, counted separately
First-hand reports are a real signal and they are never folded into the evidence band. The community-reports page lists harvested forum patterns with a link to each compound, and any approved seller reviews from the same moderated table as /reviews. If none are published, the page says so.
- 08
The questions people actually type
Individually addressable answers, including absences: what the citations did not measure, and what this site will not invent. Storage, names, legal-status limits, injecting, and cycling all live here.
- 09
Sites, needles, rotation. No dose.
The injecting page names sites where a label or a trial named them, and says so when a research peptide has no trial-established site. It contains no dose, no frequency, and no protocol. Keep it that way.
Do not treat this step as instructions to inject anything.
- 10
On and off schedules that were never measured
Published trials do not establish an on/off schedule for most of these compounds. Community cycling protocols are unverified. This site does not invent one.
- 11
Start from the outcome, not from a compound
The finder has no match score. It lists every compound measured for an outcome in people, ordered by how many people, with nulls counted, and it says so when nothing has been measured. Compounds are not ranked against one another as better or worse.
- 12
The owner's order: compounds last
Opinion, signed, with the places it runs past the evidence named on the page. Muscle, protein, measurement, blood-work-first supplements, then compounds. That order is a position, not a prescription.
Each lesson ends by naming where the claim exceeds the evidence. That is required, not decorative.
- 13
Named sellers, graded by the certificate they publish
Price as a range, then every seller named. Ranked by certificate tier before price. Affiliate income, if any, is printed on the row it comes from. No vendor has a say in a compound page.
- 14
Mixing maths, never a suggested dose
The reconstitution calculator converts an amount you already have into a syringe draw. It shows the working, and it refuses numbers that do not make sense. It never suggests what you should take.
Questions about this path
- Is this a course?
- No. It is an ordered list of pages that already exist on this site. There is no quiz, no login gate, and no completion certificate. Knowledge stays free.
- Will this tell me what to take?
- No. Aaron is a coach, not a doctor, and this path does not diagnose, treat, or prescribe. Where a dose appears on a linked page, it is a record of what a trial or a label ran, with its source attached, not a recommendation for personal use.
- Why is there a grade on some compound cards?
- The band is computed from counted human studies by a published rule, and the arithmetic prints beside the word. First-hand reports are counted separately and never added into that grade.
- Where do community reports live?
- Harvested forum patterns sit on each compound page under What users report, and are listed together at /community-reports. Approved seller reviews use the same moderated reviews table as /reviews, with a subject that names the seller. Nothing is published until it is read, and nothing is invented to fill an empty list.
There is no finish line to sell you
When you have read enough, the honest next move is the finder: pick the outcome you actually care about and see what has been measured in people, including when the answer is nothing. That is the product. Not a certificate.
Open the finder