Skip to content

Cholesterol, LDL and seed oils · both sides of the dispute, with the numbers

Cholesterol, LDL and seed oils: what the research actually shows

The old story was too simple. In people over 65, low cholesterol goes with dying sooner in nearly every large study. Eggs and dietary cholesterol were not the villain. Swapping animal fat for seed oils never saved lives in the randomised trials, and two of those trials sat unpublished for decades. But the record also shows lifelong low LDL protects arteries, and the keto study most cited to prove high LDL is harmless was retracted in 2026. Both sides are here, each with its numbers and who paid.
48 sources, each resolved on PubMed or read at the regulator or society that published it. None of the 10 goals meets the rule for a stronger record, which is printed below. 5 are thin, null, or ahead of the marketing. Learning only. No drug, diet brand or clinic is recommended.

Plate 47

Lipid record

What a cohort measured

70100159190mg/dL

48

Sources on the page

10

Questions in people

LDL in mg/dL. The shaded band is where one cohort of 211,290 people over 65 saw the lowest death. Not a target.

On this page. Counts, not a grade and not a ranking.

No goal on this page meets the rule for a stronger record. The rule is printed above the goals, and the count it read is printed under each one.

Read this first

Educational use only. This page is not medical advice and not a reason to start, stop or change a statin or any prescription. Doses and diets here are what a study ran. Familial hypercholesterolemia, established heart disease, diabetes and pregnancy are questions for your own doctor. Aaron Cuha is a coach, not a doctor.

Educational use only. This database summarizes published research and is not medical advice. Where a dose appears it is a record of what a trial or clinic ran, or what people describe doing, with its source attached. Nothing here is a recommendation for personal use.

What cholesterol, LDL and seed oils are

Cholesterol is a waxy fat every cell needs: it builds cell membranes and is the raw material for vitamin D, bile and the steroid hormones. It travels in the blood inside particles. LDL, low-density lipoprotein, carries it out to the tissues and is the number most guidelines target. HDL, high-density lipoprotein, carries it back and is often called the good cholesterol. Total cholesterol is the sum.

Seed oils are oils pressed from seeds such as soybean, corn, safflower, sunflower and cottonseed. Their main fat is linoleic acid, an omega-6 polyunsaturated fat. For decades the advice was to swap saturated animal fat for these oils to lower cholesterol and prevent heart disease. The 2024 book Dark Calories argues the opposite: that seed oils high in linoleic acid drive inflammation and chronic disease. This page tests both the old advice and the challenge against the trials and cohorts.

The dispute is really several questions with different answers: whether high LDL harms arteries, whether low cholesterol is dangerous in older age, whether statins help healthy older people live longer, whether eggs and saturated fat matter, and whether seed oils help or hurt. Each gets its own card below, graded by the same printed rule as every other page on this site.

The case against the old advice

Each side has a strong story and real evidence. Neither is the whole picture. The three cards below are the strongest points against the advice of the last half century; the amber box under them is the strongest case for it.

The case for the old advice

Genes that lower LDL for life

People born with PCSK9 gene variants have lower LDL from birth. In one cohort a 28 percent lower LDL went with 88 percent less coronary heart disease. Nobody chooses their genes, so illness and lifestyle cannot explain it.

Lowering LDL in trials

Across 28 randomised statin trials and 186,854 people, each 1.0 mmol/L lower LDL cut major vascular events by 21 percent, at every age studied, though the coronary benefit shrank with age.

Low LDL still meant fewer heart attacks

Even in the Japanese cohort where low LDL went with more deaths in people over 65, it went with less coronary artery disease (HR 0.56). The extra deaths came from somewhere other than the arteries.

The numbers on a lipid panel, and what a trial ran

Every number here is what a study measured or a trial ran, named beside it. None is a target for a reader. Lipid results are reported in mg/dL in the US and mmol/L almost everywhere else, so the same study can look different depending on the unit.

LDL cholesterol
The cholesterol carried in LDL particles. For adults aged 65 and over, the Shenzhen authors proposed 100 to 159 mg/dL as the range with the lowest overall and cardiovascular death in their cohort. That is an observational range, not a treatment target.
mg/dL and mmol/L
Two units for the same thing. The Copenhagen study prints both: its lowest-death LDL in the latest cohort was 3.5 mmol/L, which is 135 mg/dL.
HDL cholesterol
Higher is not always better. In 52,268 men and 64,240 women in Copenhagen, the lowest death rate was at about 73 mg/dL for men and 93 for women, and very high HDL went with more deaths.
Linoleic acid, percent of calories
How much of the diet is omega-6 linoleic acid. In the migraine trial, control and omega-3 diets kept it near 7 percent of calories; the seed oil cut took it to 1.8 percent or less.
Omega-6 to omega-3 ratio
How much omega-6 against omega-3 the diet holds. Across 31 randomised trials, lowering this ratio reduced two inflammation signals, TNF-alpha and IL-6.
Hazard ratio
How often an event happened in one group against another. In STAREE, a hazard ratio of 0.70 for cardiovascular events means fewer events on atorvastatin, 297 against 412 people; 0.94 for disability-free survival, not significant, means no clear difference.

What a trial or cohort ran

Each row is a record from a paper. It is not a plan for you.

GoalWhoWhat the trial ranSource
Statins after 709971 Australians aged 70 and over without heart disease, diabetes or dementiaAtorvastatin 40 mg once a day or identical placebo, median 5.9 years.PMID 42670961
Seed oil swap, Sydney458 men aged 30 to 59 after a heart eventSafflower oil and safflower margarine in place of animal fats and common margarines, from 1966 to 1973.PMID 23386268
Seed oil swap, Minnesota4393 men and 4664 women in state hospitals and a nursing homeA diet with 9 percent of calories from saturated fat and 15 percent from polyunsaturated fat, against 18 and 5 percent.PMID 2643423
Cutting seed oils, migraine182 adults with migraine16 weeks with two thirds of food provided: omega-3 raised to 1.5 g a day and linoleic acid cut to 1.8 percent of calories or less, against omega-3 alone or control.PMID 34526307
Cutting seed oils, head injury122 people with persistent post-traumatic headache12 weeks of a high omega-3, low omega-6 diet against control.PMID 40600308
High LDL on keto80 lean keto dieters with LDL of 190 mg/dL or moreNo intervention: a mean 4.7 years on their own ketogenic diets, scanned once and compared with matched controls.PMID 39372369

What studies in people found, by goal

Stronger records first. Nulls and marketing-ahead goals stay on the same page. Every card is people only; animal work is in its own section below. Nothing here is ranked against the others, and no clinic or device is recommended.

How the tier is decided, so you can check it against the counts printed under each one. Stronger: a clinical guideline or a medical society's indication list recommends it in a named setting, or a pooled analysis of randomised trials favours the change named on the card and the source rated the certainty moderate. Thin: the pooled result was null or went against the change named on the card for the goal as named, the source rated it very low, or nothing was pooled at all. Mixed: everything else, including a result that moved one measure and not another.

  1. Mixed, local, or early

    5 observational cohorts pooled, 2,317 people; certainty not graded by the source; result favours the change named on the card

    Higher LDL after 65, and living longer. In people over 65, higher LDL goes with living longer in nearly every large study, and none of them is a trial

    Who was studied

    Older adults followed over years. A pooled analysis of 5 cohorts and 2,317 people with a median age of 85; a 2016 review of 19 cohort studies and 68,094 people over 60; and single cohorts of 1,391,616 Koreans, 283,289 Japanese, 211,290 Chinese, 12,334 healthy older adults in ASPREE, three Danish cohorts, and 999 Italians. All observational. Some authors declare drug company consultancies.

    Higher LDL went with lower death in cohorts covering 92 percent of the people in the 2016 review, and with lower death per 1 mmol/L higher LDL in the very old (HR 0.87). In Japan, LDL under 80 mg/dL went with more deaths (HR 1.57) and more disability (HR 1.31). In China, LDL under 100 went with more deaths, and the authors proposed 100 to 159 as optimal after 65. In ASPREE the lowest death was at 3.3 to 3.4 mmol/L, and in Italy a total cholesterol under 200 had the highest death rate.

    Setting in the evidence

    Community-dwelling older adults, mostly not on cholesterol drugs.

    What this does not show

    That raising LDL makes anyone live longer. Illness, frailty and poor nutrition lower cholesterol, so low cholesterol may be a sign of disease rather than its cause. In the same cohorts, low LDL still went with fewer heart attacks, and in ASPREE higher LDL meant more cardiovascular deaths.

  2. Mixed, local, or early

    28 randomised trials pooled, 186,854 people; certainty not graded by the source; result mixed

    Statins after 70, without heart disease. A 2026 trial in healthy people over 70 cut heart attacks and strokes but did not extend healthy life

    Who was studied

    STAREE, a randomised double-blind trial of 9971 Australians aged 70 and over without heart disease, diabetes or dementia, government funded. And an analysis of 28 randomised statin trials, 186,854 people, of whom 14,483 were over 75.

    In STAREE, major cardiovascular events fell from 412 to 297 people (HR 0.70). Death, dementia or lasting disability: 637 against 676 (HR 0.94, not significant). Serious adverse events were 2.7 percent in each group, with more muscle, liver and diabetes events on atorvastatin. Across 28 trials, each 1.0 mmol/L lower LDL cut major vascular events 21 percent, with a smaller coronary benefit at older ages.

    Setting in the evidence

    Atorvastatin 40 mg a day in STAREE; various statins in the pooled trials.

    What this does not show

    Longer disability-free life from a statin in healthy people over 70, over six years. It also does not apply to people who already have heart disease.

  3. Mixed, local, or early

    17 randomised trials pooled, 66,337 people; certainty mixed; result mixed

    Cutting saturated fat. Cutting saturated fat made no meaningful difference for people at low heart risk; it may help those at high risk

    Who was studied

    A 2026 risk-stratified review of 17 randomised trials and 66,337 people, low to moderate certainty. And the Minnesota Coronary Experiment, 4393 men and 4664 women, first reported in 1989 and reanalysed from recovered data in 2016.

    Cutting saturated fat gave all-cause death RR 0.96 and non-fatal heart attack 0.86, neither significant. For low-risk people the absolute effects were below the authors' importance thresholds; for high-risk people above them, more so when the replacement was polyunsaturated fat. In Minnesota, halving saturated fat from 18 to 9 percent of calories lowered cholesterol but did not change heart events or deaths.

    Setting in the evidence

    Diet advice and supplied diets, mostly decades-old trials.

    What this does not show

    That saturated fat is harmless for everyone. The high-risk subgroup may benefit, and the review's certainty is low to moderate.

  4. Mixed, local, or early

    31 randomised trials pooled; certainty not graded by the source; result mixed

    Cutting seed oils for pain and inflammation. Cutting linoleic acid doubled the headache benefit of omega-3 in a randomised trial, and a lower omega-6 ratio reduced two inflammation signals

    Who was studied

    Randomised: 182 adults with migraine for 16 weeks and 122 people with post-traumatic headache for 12 weeks, NIH funded; 31 trials of lowering the omega-6 to omega-3 ratio; and 30 trials of adding linoleic acid. Observational and genetic: 2802 and 12,401 people.

    In migraine, adding omega-3 and cutting linoleic acid cut headache days by 4.0 a month against control, twice the 2.0 from omega-3 alone. In post-traumatic headache, the same diet cut headache days by 2.1 a month and pain intensity. Across 31 trials, a lower omega-6 ratio reduced TNF-alpha and IL-6 but not CRP. Across 30 trials, adding linoleic acid did not raise inflammation markers overall, though larger increases may raise CRP. The genetic study found no simple pro-inflammatory rule for omega-6.

    Setting in the evidence

    Supplied or guided diets low in linoleic acid and high in fish omega-3.

    What this does not show

    That every kind of inflammation responds, or that cutting seed oils alone, without raising omega-3, does the same. The headache impact scores did not change significantly in either headache trial.

  5. Mixed, local, or early

    cohorts, genetic studies and trials pooled, count not printed in the abstract; certainty not graded by the source; result favours the change named on the card

    Lifelong lower LDL from genes. People born with lower LDL have far fewer heart attacks, the hardest evidence for the critics to answer

    Who was studied

    A genetic study inside a 15-year cohort of 3363 Black and 9524 white Americans, and the European Atherosclerosis Society consensus pooling over 200 cohorts, genetic studies and trials with more than 2 million people. Critics answer in a 2018 review.

    PCSK9 variants that lowered LDL 28 percent went with 88 percent less coronary heart disease (HR 0.11), and a milder variant lowering LDL 15 percent with 47 percent less (HR 0.50). The consensus concluded LDL causes atherosclerotic disease, rising with dose and years of exposure. The 2018 critics' review argues the consensus rests on misleading statistics and excluded unsuccessful trials.

    Setting in the evidence

    Natural genetic variation, and drug trials.

    What this does not show

    What happens when LDL is driven very low late in life, or that the same applies in older age, where the cohorts above point the other way on overall death.

  6. Thin, null, or marketing ahead

    nothing pooled; certainty not graded by the source; no pooled result

    Cholesterol and dementia in later life. Higher cholesterol ratios in your seventies went with less dementia; very low LDL from drugs did not harm memory

    Who was studied

    3392 Dutch adults aged 70 to 78 followed a median 6.7 years, observational. And 473 patients with heart disease kept on evolocumab for a median 5.1 more years, at a median LDL of 35 mg/dL.

    A one standard deviation higher LDL to HDL ratio went with 19 percent lower dementia risk, independent of statins and APOE genotype. In the evolocumab group, executive function did not change over long follow-up.

    Setting in the evidence

    Community-dwelling older adults; patients with heart disease on drug therapy.

    What this does not show

    That raising cholesterol prevents dementia, or that very low LDL is safe for the brain in people already at high dementia risk. Neither question has been tested in a trial.

  7. Thin, null, or marketing ahead

    33 cohort risk estimates pooled, 1,720,108 people; certainty not graded by the source; result null

    Cutting eggs and dietary cholesterol. Across 1,720,108 people, an egg a day was not linked to heart disease

    Who was studied

    Observational: a 2020 meta-analysis of 33 risk estimates and 1,720,108 people, three large US cohorts, and a 2019 pooled analysis of 29,615 US adults from 6 cohorts. Plus the American Heart Association's 2020 science advisory.

    One more egg a day was not linked to cardiovascular disease (RR 0.98), and in the US cohorts an egg a day or more was not either (HR 0.93). The AHA advisory says observational studies generally show no significant link, and guidelines dropped the daily cholesterol cap. The 2019 analysis disagreed: each additional 300 mg of dietary cholesterol a day went with more heart disease (HR 1.17).

    Setting in the evidence

    Usual diets, reported by questionnaire.

    What this does not show

    That eggs lower risk, or what happens at very high intakes in people whose LDL rises sharply with dietary cholesterol.

  8. Thin, null, or marketing ahead

    19 randomised trials pooled, 6,461 people; certainty low; result null

    Replacing animal fat with seed oils. The randomised trials never showed the seed oil swap saves lives, and in Sydney more people died

    Who was studied

    Randomised: 19 trials and 6461 people in Cochrane; the Sydney Diet Heart Study, 458 men; the Minnesota Coronary Experiment, 9423 people; and a 2017 analysis splitting trials by how well they were controlled. Not randomised: the Finnish Mental Hospital Study. Observational: blood and fat tissue linoleic acid in 68,659 people across 30 cohorts and in 811,069 people with diet data, one pool with Unilever support.

    Cochrane found more omega-6 made no difference to deaths (RR 1.00). In Sydney, deaths were 17.6 against 11.8 percent (HR 1.62). In Minnesota, cholesterol fell 13.8 percent with no fewer deaths, and each 30 mg/dL fall went with 22 percent more. Adequately controlled trials only: no effect on heart deaths (1.13). The non-randomised Finnish study found about half as much coronary disease on the high polyunsaturated diet, and the observational pools found higher linoleic acid went with less heart disease and lower death (RR 0.87). A Danish fat-biopsy study found no link either way.

    Setting in the evidence

    Safflower, corn and soybean oils and margarines in place of animal fats.

    What this does not show

    A clean verdict. The randomised record shows no lives saved; the observational record shows people with more linoleic acid in their blood doing better. Those answer different questions, and the trials were mostly decades old and in men.

  9. Thin, null, or marketing ahead

    nothing pooled; certainty not graded by the source; no pooled result

    Pushing HDL very high. The good cholesterol is not good past a point: very high HDL went with more deaths

    Who was studied

    52,268 men and 64,240 women in two Copenhagen cohorts. Observational.

    Death followed a U shape. The lowest was at about 73 mg/dL for men and 93 for women. Men at 116 or more had about twice the death rate (HR 2.06); women at 135 or more had HR 1.68.

    Setting in the evidence

    General population, natural HDL levels.

    What this does not show

    Why. The authors say the finding needs confirmation in other studies.

  10. Thin, null, or marketing ahead

    nothing pooled; certainty not graded by the source; no pooled result

    High LDL on keto: lean mass hyper-responders. One scan found no extra plaque; a year later, the follow-up's own data showed plaque growing in most participants

    Who was studied

    80 lean keto dieters with LDL averaging 272 mg/dL, scanned once against matched controls, funded by the Citizen Science Foundation; a one-year follow-up of 100 such dieters, now retracted; a web survey of 548 low-carbohydrate dieters; and one case report.

    In the 2024 study, plaque and calcium scores did not differ from controls with lower LDL, and LDL did not track plaque. The 2025 follow-up scanned 100 people with median LDL of 237 mg/dL a year apart. Read from its own numbers: noncalcified plaque volume rose by a median of 18.9 cubic millimetres, and even the lower quartile rose 9.3, so at least three quarters of participants added plaque in a year. Within this group, ApoB and years of high LDL did not predict how much; baseline plaque did. Because everyone in it had very high LDL, it could not compare high LDL with normal LDL. The paper was retracted in 2026 at the request of its authors and the editors, who cited methodology errors. The survey found leaner people had bigger LDL rises, which fell when some carbohydrate returned. One man held an LDL of 574 for nearly seven years with no plaque.

    Setting in the evidence

    Self-chosen ketogenic diets.

    What this does not show

    That high LDL on keto is safe over decades, or that it is the cause of the plaque growth: the follow-up had no comparison group with normal LDL. Long-term outcomes have not been studied.

First-hand reports, counted separately

One person's own account, shown on its own. Not blinded, no comparison group, and never added into any grade on this page.

Aaron Cuha, owner of this archive

Eliminated seed oils from his diet and reports that his inflammation is gone. One person, with no comparison group and no blinding, recorded here as his own account. The randomised trial closest to what he did is the migraine trial on the inflammation card, where cutting linoleic acid on top of omega-3 doubled the drop in headache days.

What studies in animals found, kept apart

This page is about people. Animal cholesterol and seed oil studies were not used, so nothing here rests on a mouse. The section stays on the page so that is visible.

How to read this record

Two kinds of evidence are kept apart on every card. Randomised trials show what happens when one thing is changed. Cohorts show who does well in real life, but cannot fully separate cause from sign. Both are kept, and neither is thrown out for being mainstream or for not being mainstream.

The older-adult evidence is the strongest support for the view that low cholesterol is dangerous, and it is all observational. Illness lowers cholesterol, which is the main reason the cohorts may overstate the risk; the same cohorts still show low LDL meaning fewer heart attacks.

The seed oil evidence is the reverse. The randomised trials, including two recovered decades late, never showed the swap saving lives, and Sydney showed harm. The observational blood studies point the other way, and one pool had support from a margarine maker.

Money runs in every direction on this topic. Drug companies fund many cholesterol researchers; a margarine maker supported one seed oil analysis; the sugar industry secretly funded the review that blamed fat; a keto advocacy foundation funded the lean mass hyper-responder scans. Each source below names its own.

A position, labelled as one

The blocks above are the studies. The block below is a judgment about what to do with them. It has to say where it goes past the measurements.

Aaron Cuha’s position

This is opinion, not a finding. Everything else on this page is the evidence.

Cholesterol is essential, and in older adults low cholesterol is a warning sign that most large studies tie to dying sooner. The randomised trials never showed that swapping animal fat for seed oils saves lives, and cutting seed oils has real trial support for pain and inflammation. What the record does not show is that high LDL is harmless for arteries in general: lifelong genetic evidence and statin trials point the other way, and the keto study most cited for that claim was retracted.

The reasoning

  • Cohorts covering hundreds of thousands of people over 65 tie low LDL to more deaths, with the lowest death often around 100 to 159 mg/dL.
  • Two recovered randomised trials, Sydney and Minnesota, swapped animal fat for seed oil and saved no lives, and Sydney recorded more deaths.
  • In STAREE, a statin cut cardiovascular events in healthy people over 70 but did not extend disability-free life.
  • People born with lower LDL have far fewer heart attacks, and the 2025 keto plaque paper was retracted.

Where this goes beyond the evidence

This position goes beyond the evidence in two places. It treats the older-adult cohorts as a warning sign rather than proof that higher cholesterol protects, which is a judgment about reverse causation the cohorts cannot settle. And it treats the seed oil trials as stronger than the blood-level cohorts because they were randomised, though those trials were decades old, small by modern standards and mostly in men. A modern randomised trial of cutting seed oils, measuring death and heart disease, would settle what neither side can now.

Who this is not for

Anyone with familial hypercholesterolemia, a prior heart attack or stroke, or diabetes, whose treatment belongs with their own doctor; anyone considering stopping a prescribed statin because of this page; and anyone who wants this page to replace a clinician.

Aaron Cuha, who built this archive and reads the studies behind the pages. He is a coach, not a doctor, and no medical credential is claimed for him anywhere on this site. More about who writes this

Read the results this rests on

Who it is for, and who it is wrong for

For

  • Someone over 65 who has been told their cholesterol is too high and wants to see what the large older-adult studies actually found, before talking it through with their doctor.
  • Someone who has read Dark Calories or cut seed oils and wants the buried trials, the counter-evidence and the inflammation trials in one place.

Wrong for

  • Anyone with familial hypercholesterolemia

    A genetic condition of very high LDL from birth. The genetic evidence on this page bears on it directly, and the older-adult cohorts studied general populations, not this condition.

  • Anyone after a heart attack or stroke

    Those trials are a different question. The STAREE result is for people over 70 without heart disease.

  • Anyone stopping a statin on their own

    STAREE found fewer cardiovascular events on atorvastatin (HR 0.70). Changing a prescription belongs with the doctor who wrote it.

  • Anyone wanting a target number

    The ranges here are where death was lowest in observational cohorts. They are not treatment targets for any one person.

Limits and safety, with the numbers

Where this sits in the archive

This site teaches a blood panel first. A lipid panel, with LDL, HDL, triglycerides and ideally ApoB, is the starting point; the marker pages explain each number. Nothing here replaces reading your own results with your own doctor.

Disclosed both ways: the owner of this archive eliminated seed oils and reports his inflammation is gone. That is recorded as a first-hand report in its own section, not counted in any grade. His full protocol is at /my-protocols.

Nothing on this page is for sale. No seller wrote it, and no drug, diet brand or oil is recommended or ranked.

Approaches people take, not a prescription

Four approaches people take to cholesterol and fats. None is ranked, and none is a prescription.

Statin therapy

A daily drug that lowers LDL by blocking the liver's cholesterol production.

Evidence match. STAREE in healthy people over 70, and 28 randomised trials pooled.

Mismatch. In STAREE it cut cardiovascular events but did not extend disability-free life; muscle and diabetes effects are real at higher doses.

Low-carbohydrate or ketogenic diet with high LDL

A diet that in lean people can raise LDL sharply, the lean mass hyper-responder pattern.

Evidence match. The 2024 cross-sectional scan of 80 people found no extra plaque.

Mismatch. The 2025 follow-up was retracted, and no long-term outcome study exists.

Seed-oil-free eating

Removing soybean, corn, safflower, sunflower and similar oils, as Dark Calories argues.

Evidence match. The Sydney and Minnesota trials, and the migraine and head injury trials of cutting linoleic acid.

Mismatch. Observational blood studies tie higher linoleic acid to less heart disease.

Mediterranean pattern

Olive oil, fish, vegetables, nuts and legumes, a whole-diet approach.

Evidence match. The Lyon Diet Heart Study after a first heart attack, 14 events against 44.

Mismatch. It tests a whole diet, so no single fat can be credited.

What a cholesterol claim has to state before it can be compared with a study

  • The age group. The older-adult cohorts and the middle-aged trials answer different questions.
  • Which number: total cholesterol, LDL, HDL, ApoB or a ratio, and in which unit.
  • Whether the source is a randomised trial, a cohort or a genetic study, and what that design can and cannot show.
  • Who paid, and whether the paper has since been corrected or retracted.

Claims this page will not make

High cholesterol makes you live longer.
In people over 65, higher LDL goes with lower death in nearly every large cohort. No trial has shown that raising it extends life, and low LDL still means fewer heart attacks.
Cholesterol causes heart disease, full stop.
Lifelong genetic evidence ties lower LDL to far fewer heart attacks. But in older adults low cholesterol goes with more deaths overall, and the dietary trials of lowering it never saved lives.
Everyone over 70 should be on a statin.
STAREE cut cardiovascular events (HR 0.70, 297 against 412 people) but did not extend disability-free survival over about six years.
Eggs raise your heart risk.
Across 1,720,108 people, an egg a day was not linked to heart disease. One 2019 pooled analysis disagreed for dietary cholesterol overall.
Seed oils are heart healthy.
The randomised trials of swapping animal fat for seed oils never showed lives saved, and in Sydney more people died. The positive evidence is observational.
High LDL on keto is proven harmless.
The 2025 follow-up most cited for that showed noncalcified plaque growing by a median of 18.9 cubic millimetres in a year, and was retracted in 2026 at its authors' request. The 2024 study is one scan of 80 people.
The higher your HDL, the better.
In 52,268 men and 64,240 women in Copenhagen, very high HDL went with up to about twice the death rate (HR 2.06 in men).

Questions people ask

Is high cholesterol good for older people?
In people over 65, higher LDL goes with lower overall death in nearly every large cohort, from 68,094 people in a 2016 review to 283,289 in Japan. These are observational, and illness lowers cholesterol, so it shows low cholesterol is a warning sign more than it proves high cholesterol protects.
What is the best LDL cholesterol level for seniors?
No trial has set one. In 211,290 adults over 65 in China, the lowest death was at LDL of 100 to 159 mg/dL; in Denmark, around 3.5 mmol/L (135 mg/dL); in ASPREE, 3.3 to 3.4 mmol/L. These are observational ranges, not personal targets.
Do statins help people over 70?
In the 2026 STAREE trial of 9971 healthy people over 70, atorvastatin cut heart attacks, strokes and related events (HR 0.70, 297 against 412 people) but did not extend life free of dementia or disability over about six years.
Are seed oils inflammatory?
Cutting linoleic acid on top of raising omega-3 doubled the headache benefit in an NIH migraine trial, and lowering the omega-6 to omega-3 ratio reduced TNF-alpha and IL-6 across 31 trials. Adding linoleic acid did not raise inflammation markers overall in 30 other trials.
What does Dark Calories argue, and does the research back it?
The 2024 book argues seed oils high in linoleic acid drive chronic disease. Its strongest support is randomised: the Sydney and Minnesota trials swapped animal fat for seed oils, saved no lives, and stayed unpublished for decades. The main counter-evidence is observational blood studies.
Was the Minnesota Coronary Experiment hidden?
Its original 1989 report said only that there was no difference. Recovered raw data, published in the BMJ in 2016, showed corn oil lowered cholesterol 13.8 percent with no fewer deaths, and each 30 mg/dL fall went with 22 percent more deaths.
Are eggs bad for cholesterol and heart health?
Across 1,720,108 people an egg a day was not linked to heart disease, and the American Heart Association says observational studies generally show no significant link to dietary cholesterol. A 2019 US analysis did link higher dietary cholesterol to more heart disease.
Was the keto LDL study retracted, and what did its data show?
The 2025 KETO-CTA paper, Plaque Predicts Plaque, ApoB Does Not, was retracted in 2026 at the request of its authors and the editors. Its own data showed noncalcified plaque rising by a median of 18.9 cubic millimetres in a year among 100 people with very high LDL, with ApoB not predicting how much. The 2024 study of 80 people still stands.
What is a lean mass hyper-responder?
A lean, metabolically healthy person whose LDL rises sharply on a low-carbohydrate diet, with high HDL and low triglycerides. A survey of 548 low-carbohydrate dieters found 100 with the pattern, and LDL fell when some carbohydrate returned.
Is very high HDL cholesterol bad?
In 52,268 men and 64,240 women in Copenhagen, men with HDL of 116 mg/dL or more had about twice the death rate (HR 2.06), and women at 135 or more had HR 1.68. The lowest death was at about 73 for men and 93 for women.
Is this cholesterol advice?
No. Aaron is a coach, not a doctor. This page reports what studies found. It does not set a target, a diet or a drug for anyone.

Sources

Knowledge stays free. No seller wrote this page. Every source below opens the record that was checked before the sentence was written, with what it found and who funded it.

Educational use only. This page is not medical advice and not a reason to start, stop or change a statin or any prescription. Doses and diets here are what a study ran. Familial hypercholesterolemia, established heart disease, diabetes and pregnancy are questions for your own doctor. Aaron Cuha is a coach, not a doctor.

Educational use only. This database summarizes published research and is not medical advice. Where a dose appears it is a record of what a trial or clinic ran, or what people describe doing, with its source attached. Nothing here is a recommendation for personal use.