Skip to content

Legal status · Australia

Is PDA with TB-500 legal in Australia?

Written by Reviewed Sep 2026

Not approvedHealing & RecoveryNo studies in people cited

Direct answer

No. PDA with TB-500 is not an approved medicine in Australia. Its legal category is "Not approved". Nothing that contains it is allowed for any use in people. Vials labeled "for research use only" get no exception: that label does not make them legal to use in people. On the evidence, no study in people is cited on its profile.

People given it
0
Found nothing
0

Legal category

Not approved

TGA registration and the Poisons Standard schedule, from the PDA with TB-500 profile.

Reviewed Sep 2026. This is a legal category, not legal advice.

A "research use only" label on a vial does not make it legal to use on people.

PDA with TB-500 in Australia at a glance

Legal categoryNot approved
TGA approval statusNot approved by TGA
Studies in people0 of 3 sources on the profile
ReviewedSep 2026

The legal category and note come from the PDA with TB-500 profile. We checked them against Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) listings on the reviewed date.

What this means

  • 01

    No product containing PDA with TB-500 is approved by TGA for any use in Australia. So nothing on sale is allowed for use in people.

  • 02

    "Research use only" is a label sellers put on. It is not a legal category that allows use in people, and it does not get a product out of medicines law.

  • 03

    Importing it, supplying it or promoting it for use in people can fall under medicines law in Australia. This page is general information, not legal advice.

What PDA with TB-500 is

The 2026 stand-in for the Wolverine stack. It pairs a salt form of the BPC-157 peptide with the piece of protein sold as TB-500. There is not one published paper on pentadeca arginate. So the blend borrows its evidence twice. It borrows from a peptide it is a salt of, and from a protein that one ingredient is only a small piece of. Vial sizes differ from seller to seller.

Pentadeca arginate, or PDA, is sold as an upgrade to BPC-157. It is the same chain of fifteen building blocks.

How it works: People assume PDA works like BPC-157 because it is the same peptide chain. Nobody has tested that for the arginate form.

Approval history: Not approved. No regulator has ever reviewed pentadeca arginate under that name. It has the same peptide sequence as BPC-157, and FDA staff who reviewed BPC-157 in July 2026 found no adequate human data.

How TGA treats this kind of product

Registers or lists medicines and health products on the ARTG, its official register. It also sorts substances into schedules in the Poisons Standard. Many peptides are Schedule 4 (prescription only). So having them without a prescription, or importing them for yourself, is restricted. That is true even when no product is registered.

The legal category above is how The Longevity Archive reads Therapeutic Goods Administration listings for PDA with TB-500 on the reviewed date. It is not a legal opinion. Rules change. Bringing a compound into the country, prescribing it and owning it can each be treated differently. Check with the agency before you act on anything here.

Check TGA directly

PDA with TB-500 in sport and the military

Whether PDA with TB-500 is banned in sport is set by the World Anti-Doping Code and by military rules, not by its legal status in Australia. Before you compete or get tested, look up PDA with TB-500 by name on the Prohibited List, or look up a named product in Global DRO. Under the World Anti-Doping Code, category S0 bans, at all times, any drug-like substance that meets two tests. No other section of the List covers it. And no government health regulator anywhere has a current approval for it as a treatment in people. Many substances that are approved somewhere are banned by name in another section. So approval does not mean a substance is allowed in sport.

The rules you compete or serve under decide this, not this page.

PDA with TB-500 in other countries

Frequently asked questions

Is PDA with TB-500 legal in Australia?

No. PDA with TB-500 is not an approved medicine in Australia. Its legal category is "Not approved". Nothing that contains it is allowed for any use in people. Vials labeled "for research use only" get no exception: that label does not make them legal to use in people. On the evidence, no study in people is cited on its profile.

Can I buy PDA with TB-500 in Australia?

There is no approved product to buy. In Australia, PDA with TB-500 has the legal category "Not approved". So no licensed pharmacy product exists. Sellers who list it "for research use only" are not selling it for use in people, and that label does not change its legal status. Sellers named on the price pages are ranked by certificate tier, then price, and any affiliate income is disclosed there. Naming a seller is not a recommendation to buy or use anything.

Is PDA with TB-500 TGA approved?

No. In Australia, PDA with TB-500 has the legal category "Not approved". That is not a TGA approval to sell it. For comparison, its US FDA status is: Not approved. No regulator has ever reviewed pentadeca arginate under that name. It has the same peptide sequence as BPC-157, and FDA staff who reviewed BPC-157 in July 2026 found no adequate human data.. On the evidence, no study in people is cited on its profile.

Related compounds in Australia

Full research profile

How PDA with TB-500 works, the studies we cite, FDA status and the full legal summary are all on its compound profile.

PDA with TB-500 profile

This page is general information about the legal status of PDA with TB-500 in Australia, current as of Sep 2026. It is not legal advice. Legal status changes. For your own situation, check with Therapeutic Goods Administration or ask a lawyer. Educational use only. This database summarizes published research and is not medical advice. Where a dose appears it is a record of what a trial or clinic ran, or what people describe doing, with its source attached. Nothing here is a recommendation for personal use. Sellers named on the price pages are ranked by certificate tier, then price, and any affiliate income is disclosed there. Naming a seller is not a recommendation to buy or use anything.