No match scores
Peptide finder
Plate 11
Goal map
Find by outcome
36
Goal pages
1
Record
The short answer
Pick what you want to change. See every compound measured for it in people, most people first. Each one shows what the study found, and the failures are counted. 70 of 453 compounds here have no study in people of any kind.
- Compounds
- 453
- No study in people
- 70
How this ranks
No match scores
Other tools print a match percentage. Nobody measured those numbers. This page shows how many people each goal was measured in, and names the goals nobody has measured in a person.
A thin record in people is usually about who pays for trials. It is not a verdict on the compound.
What users report sits next to the trial count. It is never added into it.
What are you trying to change?
Pick as many as you like. The number on each one is how many people it has been measured in across the whole archive. So you can see where the evidence is before you choose.
Somebody handed you a stack. What is actually known about it?
Add what you are looking at. You get every goal those compounds have been measured for in people. Then you get the longer list of goals they have not.
Tanning and pigmentation
Does it actually tan you?
Melanin density measured on the skin, which is one of the few cosmetic endpoints that is objective.
44 people · 4 studies in people · 4 compounds
- 01GonadorelinPeptideModerate. At least one finished study in people, and at least 100 people who took it. 3 completed trials, 110 people given it.8 reported28 people1 study
The pump got sperm going sooner, but no more men got there in the end. 28 men producing no sperm were compared: 10 wore a gonadorelin pump and 18 took the usual hormone injections. Nobody was assigned by chance, so the groups were not built alike. First sperm appeared at about six months on the pump against fourteen...
American Journal of Men's Health, 2019 · 28 people
- 02GHK-CuPeptideLimited. People have taken it in a published study, but fewer than 100 of them. 2 completed trials, 99 people given it.7 reported13 people1 study1 found nothing
found nothingNothing an outside observer could measure got better. 13 patients had laser resurfacing around the mouth, then were assigned at random to a skincare routine with or without GHK-Cu. Judges who did not know which patient got which, plus computer image analysis, found no difference in redness, wrinkles or overall skin...
Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery, 2006 · 13 people
- 03Melanotan IIPeptideStrong. At least two finished studies in people, and at least 1,000 people who took it. 5 completed trials, 1,310 people given it.9 reported3 people1 study
The first look at this compound in people was tiny, and the side effect it turned up became the reason people buy it. Three male volunteers took shots under the skin for two weeks. Their skin darkened, which was the point. Most doses made them feel sick, and the highest left them drowsy and tired. They also got...
Life Sciences, 1996 · 3 people
- 04RusfertidePeptideModerate. At least one finished study in people, and at least 100 people who took it. 5 completed trials, 166 people given it.number of people not given1 study
This study measured what the body does with rusfertide, not whether it helps anyone. Healthy adults took a range of doses, each person trying more than one, and everybody knew what they were getting. Peak levels arrived a day after the smaller doses and within hours after the larger ones. The body took anywhere from...
Drugs in R and D, 2024 · number of people not given
- 05Melanotan IPeptideModerate. At least one finished study in people, and at least 100 people who took it. 2 completed trials, 170 people given it.8 reportednumber of people not given0 studies
How this is counted
Studies in people only. Animal and lab work never goes into this ranking, because your question was about a person.
A compound is listed for a goal only when a study on its own page names that goal and reports a result for it. Just naming it is not enough. Say a paper measures testosterone but reports a result about something else. That does not count as testosterone evidence. This tool made that mistake on its first run, and it no longer does.
People counts come from the study lines themselves, and when in doubt they count low. If a line gives no number, the study still counts as a study but adds nobody to the people count. Counts are never added up across compounds, because the same person can be in more than one trial.
The order is by how many people were measured. That is a fact about the evidence, not a judgement about the compound. It is the only order this site will defend. A compound at the top of a list is the most studied. That is not the same as the best.
Nothing here is advice. Nothing here tells you to take anything.