Skip to content

No match scores

Peptide finder

Pick what you want to change. See every compound measured for it in people, most people first. Each one shows what the study found, and the failures are counted.

Plate 11

Goal map

Find by outcome

Fat lossRecoverySleepSkinLongevityThe record

36

Goal pages

1

Record

Pick your goal. What was measured opens up, including the gaps.

The short answer

Pick what you want to change. See every compound measured for it in people, most people first. Each one shows what the study found, and the failures are counted. 70 of 453 compounds here have no study in people of any kind.

Compounds
453
No study in people
70

How this ranks

No match scores

Other tools print a match percentage. Nobody measured those numbers. This page shows how many people each goal was measured in, and names the goals nobody has measured in a person.

A thin record in people is usually about who pays for trials. It is not a verdict on the compound.

What users report sits next to the trial count. It is never added into it.

What are you trying to change?

Pick as many as you like. The number on each one is how many people it has been measured in across the whole archive. So you can see where the evidence is before you choose.

Somebody handed you a stack. What is actually known about it?

Add what you are looking at. You get every goal those compounds have been measured for in people. Then you get the longer list of goals they have not.

Wound and skin healing

Does it close a wound faster?

Surgical wounds, ulcers and burns, where healing time is genuinely measurable.

68 people · 3 studies in people · 2 compounds

  1. 01Thymosin alpha-1 with KPV and LL-37BlendStrong. At least two finished studies in people, and at least 1,000 people who took it. 3 completed trials, 1,140 people given it.6 reported
    34 people2 studies1 found nothing

    • found nothingA cream made from LL-37 healed stubborn leg ulcers faster, in a small first test in people. 34 people first used a dummy cream for three weeks. Then they got LL-37 at one of three strengths, or a dummy, for four more weeks, and nobody knew which. The two lower strengths healed wounds about six and three times faster...

      Wound Repair and Regeneration, 2014 · 34 people

    • LL-37 was tested again, this time as a cream on foot ulcers in people with diabetes. People got it or a comparison by chance, and nobody knew who got what. This is only the second proper study of the peptide in people. Note the form both times. A cream, on a wound. Neither study injected LL-37. Neither tested it for...

      Archives of Dermatological Research, 2023 · number of people not given

  2. 02LL-37PeptideModerate. At least one finished study in people, and at least 100 people who took it. 2 completed trials, 182 people given it.7 reported
    34 people1 study

    • The first human test of LL-37 on wounds looked strongly positive. Thirty-four people with leg ulcers that had refused to heal had the lowest strength applied to the wound, or a dummy. Ulcers on the drug closed roughly six times faster. Nothing worrying turned up on safety. Thirty-four people is a first look, not an...

      Wound Repair and Regeneration, 2014 · 34 people

  3. 03TB-500PeptidePreliminary. Studied in people, but no published study has had people take it. 1 registered with no result.9 reported
    number of people not given0 studies
    • 04Testosterone cypionateHormoneModerate. At least one finished study in people, and at least 100 people who took it. 1 completed trial, 5,246 people given it.9 reported
      number of people not given0 studies
      • 05Omega-3SupplementStrong. At least two finished studies in people, and at least 1,000 people who took it. 3 completed trials, 34,050 people given it.4 reported
        number of people not given0 studies
        • 06GHK-CuPeptideLimited. People have taken it in a published study, but fewer than 100 of them. 2 completed trials, 99 people given it.7 reported
          number of people not given0 studies
          • 07GLOW blendBlendLimited. People have taken it in a published study, but fewer than 100 of them. 2 completed trials, 22 people given it.9 reported
            number of people not given0 studies

            How this is counted

            Studies in people only. Animal and lab work never goes into this ranking, because your question was about a person.

            A compound is listed for a goal only when a study on its own page names that goal and reports a result for it. Just naming it is not enough. Say a paper measures testosterone but reports a result about something else. That does not count as testosterone evidence. This tool made that mistake on its first run, and it no longer does.

            People counts come from the study lines themselves, and when in doubt they count low. If a line gives no number, the study still counts as a study but adds nobody to the people count. Counts are never added up across compounds, because the same person can be in more than one trial.

            The order is by how many people were measured. That is a fact about the evidence, not a judgement about the compound. It is the only order this site will defend. A compound at the top of a list is the most studied. That is not the same as the best.

            Nothing here is advice. Nothing here tells you to take anything.

            How we grade evidence