Dasatinib dosage and evidence
Written by Aaron CuhaReviewed Sep 2026
The short answer
Dasatinib is an approved leukemia drug also tried, with quercetin, to clear worn-out cells. Early studies with no comparison group looked good. The proper studies that followed did not.
Evidence grade for Dasatinib: Limited. The rule: people have taken it in a published study, but fewer than 100 of them. The sum on this page: 3 completed trials, 74 people given it. A grade counts how much has been done to people, not whether it works.
- People given it
- 74
- Human studies
- 3
- Found nothing
- 1
Dose
Approved medicine. No human dose established for unlabelled uses
Labeled amounts sit on the prescribing information. This page records what trials measured, not a personal dose.
FDA-approved for leukemia; using it to clear out worn-out cells is off-label and investigational
3 effects reported, 2 unwanted, 1 wanted, by people using it, not a trial
Goal pages: Muscle and strength, Ageing and longevity
In plain English
In plain English, from Aaron
This is how I would explain it to a friend. The evidence, with the numbers, is further down the page.
Dasatinib is a cancer drug, sold as Sprycel for some leukemias. Some people take it in short bursts with quercetin to clear out worn-out cells. That is called D+Q. It is a prescription drug with real side effects. Using it for ageing is off-label.
What people take it for
- Clearing worn-out cells to slow ageing.
- Less frailty and better physical function.
What studies in people showed
The most careful study had 60 women past menopause. After 20 weeks, D+Q did no better than no treatment on the main bone test. In lung scarring, an early study of 14 people, who all knew they were on the drugs, found they walked better. When the same team added a dummy pill group, 12 people took part and the gains did not show up. People on the drugs had 65 side effect reports against 22 on the dummy. In kidney disease from diabetes, a short course cut the number of worn-out cells within days. In old mice, D+Q helped them work better and live about 36 percent longer from when it began.
What people report
Reports, not study results
The good
- In the studies on this page, D+Q did clear worn-out cells in people within days.
The bad
- In the lung scarring study with a dummy group, people on the drugs had 65 side effect reports against 22 on the dummy.
- It is a strong prescription cancer drug with real side effects, not a supplement.
Where these come from: The results and side effect counts are from the studies on this page. We have not collected forum or user reports for this one yet.
My bottom line
This is a cancer drug. The early studies looked great, and the careful ones did not. Do not take a leukemia drug on the strength of a mouse study.
An opinion, not a finding. I am a coach, not a doctor.
What it has been measured to do
Measured in people
Goals Dasatinib has been tested for in people, biggest studies first. We count only what the studies on this page say, so the real numbers may be higher.
- Getting stronger14 people · 2 studies
What people using it report
Real people telling you what happened to them. Nobody checked it, and the people who post are not a fair sample, so it cannot prove anything works. It is still the best guide on this page to what people actually do with Dasatinib, what they expect, and what goes wrong. The full account, including the negative reports, is below.
Animal and lab work, not yet tested in people
Real results, but from animals or cells, not people. What works in a mouse often does not work the same way in a person. This is an approved medicine. So the missing study in people is for this use, not for the drug. Drug makers paid to test it for what it is approved for.
- Living longer1 animal or lab study
32 of the 36 indexed goals have no study of any kind behind Dasatinib
No study in people, animals or cells on this page reports a result for these. That does not prove Dasatinib does nothing for them. It does mean anything you have heard about Dasatinib and one of these did not come from a study cited here.
Show full evidence
What is Dasatinib?
Dasatinib is an approved leukemia drug also tried, with quercetin, to clear worn-out cells. Early studies with no comparison group looked good. The proper studies that followed did not.
Dasatinib is a cancer drug sold as Sprycel for some leukemias. Longevity researchers use it, with quercetin, to clear out worn-out cells. The pair is called D+Q. The order of the results matters. In 60 women past menopause, D+Q did no better than no treatment on the main bone test after 20 weeks. In lung scarring, a first study of 14 people who all knew they were on the drugs found they walked and got up from a chair better. It got a lot of press. The same team then ran it again in 12 people with a dummy-pill group, and those gains did not show up. No drug of this kind has yet made people healthier in a proper study. Dasatinib is a prescription drug with real side effects, not a supplement. Using it for ageing is off-label and experimental.
How does Dasatinib work?
It blocks survival signals inside worn-out cells, so they die. It works best alongside quercetin.
What do people who took Dasatinib report?
This is what real people say happened to them, good and bad. Nobody measured it. A report cannot tell a real effect from the lift people get just from expecting it to work, from a diet or training change made at the same time, or from what was really in the vial. We still put it near the top. It is the next best thing to a study in people: what happens when real people use it, including what goes wrong.
- It is essentially never discussed alone. The pattern described is short intermittent courses paired with quercetin, and often with fisetin or azithromycin added, on a schedule of a couple of days of dosing followed by weeks off and repeated. No self-report in this material isolates this drug from the others.
- The most commonly reported experience is mild fatigue on the day of dosing, lasting about a day, and several people describe no side effects at all at these intermittent doses.
- The argument made repeatedly, and it is the load-bearing assumption of the whole practice, is that the serious toxicity attached to this drug comes from continuous daily use in cancer treatment over years rather than from two days at a time. That is a reasoning step people state openly, not something established in the discussion.
- What almost nobody reports is a noticeable effect. The discussion is about tolerability and protocol, not about anything felt or measured, and the people posting generally say so.
- Prescription access is the practical obstacle described, and third party knowledge bases assembled by longevity foundations are treated as the reference point rather than any individual's experience.
- Attempts to measure an outcome are described using epigenetic age clocks, and posters in the same threads dispute whether those readouts mean anything, so even the measured reports are contested inside the community that produced them.
Sources: Senolytics and dosing threads on LongeCity, reached through site-restricted search extracts of the threads because the site itself would not load from this environment, September 2026. Nothing above is attributed to any specific post and no post is reproduced.
The evidence, in charts
Fig. 1a · how many people
74people, across 2 studies in people cited here
| Study | People | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Nature Medicine 2024 | 60 | 81% |
| EBioMedicine 2019 | 14 | 19% |
One study holds 81% of these people, so the total rests more on one study than its size suggests. Counts are the number of people each study on this page says it signed up. That includes studies that only watched people and gave nobody the compound. 2 more studies in people give no headcount and are not counted here. Studies still signing people up are left out, and only studies cited on this page are counted.
Fig. 1b · evidence mix
4 of 6 sources here are studies in people. The rest are not.
- Study in people · done in people467%
- Animal study · done in animals233%
Counted from the list of sources on this page. It counts only what we cite, so there may be more studies out there. A review counts once, however many studies it sums up.
Fig. 2 · evidence over time
The studies cover 5 different years, 2015 to 2024, counted from the list of sources on this page.
Fig. 3 · legal status at a glance
US
Approved
UK
Approved
AU
Approved
CA
Approved
Approved in all four countries shown. This is what the law says, not a verdict on the science. See Legal status below for the full text and any notes.
Fig. 5 · what the molecule is
- Kind of compound
- Small molecule
- Molecule weight
- 488.0 Da
- Half-life
- About 4 hoursShort, 1 to 6 hours
- Chain length
- None on file
No amino acid sequence is on file for Dasatinib, which is expected: a small molecule is not built from amino acids.
The studies we cite
- Study in people2024Effects of intermittent senolytic therapy on bone metabolism in postmenopausal women: a phase 2 randomized controlled trial
The strongest senolytic trial run so far came out negative. 60 postmenopausal women were given either dasatinib with quercetin, or nothing. After 20 weeks, the blood marker of bone breakdown that the whole trial was built around had not separated between the groups. Bone was a sensible place to look, because worn-out cells are thought to drive bone loss. It did not work out.
60 postmenopausal women randomised to dasatinib plus quercetin or control: the primary endpoint, change in the bone resorption marker CTx at 20 weeks, did not differ between groups.
- Study in people2023Senolytics dasatinib and quercetin in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a phase I, single-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled pilot trial
A pilot that looked positive lost its effect the moment a dummy group was added. The same team ran it again in twelve people with lung scarring. Frailty, lung function and physical function did not meaningfully separate. The people on the drugs reported 65 non-serious side effects against 22 on the dummy. Small numbers, and a clear lesson about how much to trust an uncontrolled pilot.
The same team's open-label pilot repeated with a placebo arm, n=12: frailty, pulmonary and physical function did not appear to differ meaningfully between groups, and the drug arm reported 65 non-serious adverse events against 22 on placebo.
- Study in people2019Senolytics decrease senescent cells in humans: preliminary report from a clinical trial of dasatinib plus quercetin in individuals with diabetic kidney disease
This is the first evidence in people that the combination actually clears worn-out cells. Patients with diabetic kidney disease took it briefly, and within days the burden of those cells fell, along with the inflammatory signals they release. What it does not show is any benefit to the patients. Clearing the cells is the theory. Whether anyone feels or functions better is the test.
First human evidence that D+Q reduces senescent-cell burden and SASP factors within days.
- Study in people2019Senolytics in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: results from a first-in-human, open-label, pilot study
An early study in 14 people with lung scarring found their physical function improved. Everybody knew they were taking the drugs and there was no comparison group. Side effects were mostly mild to moderate. Read this as the study that justified running a proper trial, and then read what the proper trial went on to find.
Open-label pilot in 14 IPF patients: improved physical function measures; adverse events mostly mild to moderate.
- Animal study2015The Achilles' heel of senescent cells: from transcriptome to senolytic drugs
In mice: dasatinib cleared worn-out cells. With quercetin, it helped old mice, and mice bred to age fast, function better.
Dasatinib selectively cleared senescent cells and, combined with quercetin, improved function in aged and progeroid mice.
- Animal study2018Senolytics improve physical function and increase lifespan in old age
In old mice: D+Q given every so often helped them move and function better. From the point treatment began, they lived about 36 percent longer.
Intermittent D+Q in old mice improved physical function and extended remaining lifespan by about 36%.
Common questions
Has Dasatinib been tested in people?
Yes. 74 people given it across 3 completed trials cited here, 1 of which found nothing. Dasatinib is an approved leukemia drug also tried, with quercetin, to clear worn-out cells. Early studies with no comparison group looked good. The proper studies that followed did not.
What is the Dasatinib dosage?
Approved medicine. No human dose established for unlabelled uses. Labeled amounts sit on the prescribing information. This page records what trials measured, not a personal dose. FDA-approved for leukemia; using it to clear out worn-out cells is off-label and investigational
Is Dasatinib FDA-approved?
FDA-approved for leukemia; using it to clear out worn-out cells is off-label and investigational
Is dasatinib safe to take for anti-aging?
It is a strong prescription cancer drug with real side effects. Using it to clear worn-out cells is experimental. In studies it was given in short bursts with a doctor watching. It is not a casual supplement.
Latest reading on Dasatinib
Blog posts about Dasatinib, newest first.
- Longevity / Sep 27, 2026 / 12 minPeptides for Longevity: What the Evidence Actually Shows in 2026
- Longevity / Sep 27, 2026 / 9 minSenolytics in 2026: Dasatinib plus Quercetin, Fisetin, and What Human Trials Have Shown
- Longevity / Sep 27, 2026 / 9 minThe Rapamycin Dosing Debate: What PEARL Tested, the Bioavailability Problem, and What Is Unproven
- Longevity / Sep 27, 2026 / 8 minKlotho Explained: Protein, Peptide, Gene Therapy or Supplement?