Skip to content

Dasatinib dosage and evidence

Written by Reviewed Sep 2026

Limited. People have taken it in a published study, but fewer than 100 of them. 3 completed trials, 74 people given it.3 reported

The short answer

Dasatinib is an approved leukemia drug also tried, with quercetin, to clear worn-out cells. Early studies with no comparison group looked good. The proper studies that followed did not.

Evidence grade for Dasatinib: Limited. The rule: people have taken it in a published study, but fewer than 100 of them. The sum on this page: 3 completed trials, 74 people given it. A grade counts how much has been done to people, not whether it works.

People given it
74
Human studies
3
Found nothing
1

Dose

Approved medicine. No human dose established for unlabelled uses

Labeled amounts sit on the prescribing information. This page records what trials measured, not a personal dose.

FDA-approved for leukemia; using it to clear out worn-out cells is off-label and investigational

3 effects reported, 2 unwanted, 1 wanted, by people using it, not a trial

Goal pages: Muscle and strength, Ageing and longevity

In plain English

In plain English, from Aaron

This is how I would explain it to a friend. The evidence, with the numbers, is further down the page.

Dasatinib is a cancer drug, sold as Sprycel for some leukemias. Some people take it in short bursts with quercetin to clear out worn-out cells. That is called D+Q. It is a prescription drug with real side effects. Using it for ageing is off-label.

What people take it for

  • Clearing worn-out cells to slow ageing.
  • Less frailty and better physical function.

What studies in people showed

The most careful study had 60 women past menopause. After 20 weeks, D+Q did no better than no treatment on the main bone test. In lung scarring, an early study of 14 people, who all knew they were on the drugs, found they walked better. When the same team added a dummy pill group, 12 people took part and the gains did not show up. People on the drugs had 65 side effect reports against 22 on the dummy. In kidney disease from diabetes, a short course cut the number of worn-out cells within days. In old mice, D+Q helped them work better and live about 36 percent longer from when it began.

What people report

Reports, not study results

The good

  • In the studies on this page, D+Q did clear worn-out cells in people within days.

The bad

  • In the lung scarring study with a dummy group, people on the drugs had 65 side effect reports against 22 on the dummy.
  • It is a strong prescription cancer drug with real side effects, not a supplement.

Where these come from: The results and side effect counts are from the studies on this page. We have not collected forum or user reports for this one yet.

My bottom line

This is a cancer drug. The early studies looked great, and the careful ones did not. Do not take a leukemia drug on the strength of a mouse study.

An opinion, not a finding. I am a coach, not a doctor.

What it has been measured to do

Measured in people

Goals Dasatinib has been tested for in people, biggest studies first. We count only what the studies on this page say, so the real numbers may be higher.

What people using it report

Real people telling you what happened to them. Nobody checked it, and the people who post are not a fair sample, so it cannot prove anything works. It is still the best guide on this page to what people actually do with Dasatinib, what they expect, and what goes wrong. The full account, including the negative reports, is below.

Animal and lab work, not yet tested in people

Real results, but from animals or cells, not people. What works in a mouse often does not work the same way in a person. This is an approved medicine. So the missing study in people is for this use, not for the drug. Drug makers paid to test it for what it is approved for.

32 of the 36 indexed goals have no study of any kind behind Dasatinib

No study in people, animals or cells on this page reports a result for these. That does not prove Dasatinib does nothing for them. It does mean anything you have heard about Dasatinib and one of these did not come from a study cited here.

Show full evidence

What is Dasatinib?

Dasatinib is an approved leukemia drug also tried, with quercetin, to clear worn-out cells. Early studies with no comparison group looked good. The proper studies that followed did not.

Dasatinib is a cancer drug sold as Sprycel for some leukemias. Longevity researchers use it, with quercetin, to clear out worn-out cells. The pair is called D+Q. The order of the results matters. In 60 women past menopause, D+Q did no better than no treatment on the main bone test after 20 weeks. In lung scarring, a first study of 14 people who all knew they were on the drugs found they walked and got up from a chair better. It got a lot of press. The same team then ran it again in 12 people with a dummy-pill group, and those gains did not show up. No drug of this kind has yet made people healthier in a proper study. Dasatinib is a prescription drug with real side effects, not a supplement. Using it for ageing is off-label and experimental.

How does Dasatinib work?

It blocks survival signals inside worn-out cells, so they die. It works best alongside quercetin.

What do people who took Dasatinib report?

This is what real people say happened to them, good and bad. Nobody measured it. A report cannot tell a real effect from the lift people get just from expecting it to work, from a diet or training change made at the same time, or from what was really in the vial. We still put it near the top. It is the next best thing to a study in people: what happens when real people use it, including what goes wrong.

  • It is essentially never discussed alone. The pattern described is short intermittent courses paired with quercetin, and often with fisetin or azithromycin added, on a schedule of a couple of days of dosing followed by weeks off and repeated. No self-report in this material isolates this drug from the others.
  • The most commonly reported experience is mild fatigue on the day of dosing, lasting about a day, and several people describe no side effects at all at these intermittent doses.
  • The argument made repeatedly, and it is the load-bearing assumption of the whole practice, is that the serious toxicity attached to this drug comes from continuous daily use in cancer treatment over years rather than from two days at a time. That is a reasoning step people state openly, not something established in the discussion.
  • What almost nobody reports is a noticeable effect. The discussion is about tolerability and protocol, not about anything felt or measured, and the people posting generally say so.
  • Prescription access is the practical obstacle described, and third party knowledge bases assembled by longevity foundations are treated as the reference point rather than any individual's experience.
  • Attempts to measure an outcome are described using epigenetic age clocks, and posters in the same threads dispute whether those readouts mean anything, so even the measured reports are contested inside the community that produced them.

Sources: Senolytics and dosing threads on LongeCity, reached through site-restricted search extracts of the threads because the site itself would not load from this environment, September 2026. Nothing above is attributed to any specific post and no post is reproduced.

The evidence, in charts

Fig. 1a · how many people

74people, across 2 studies in people cited here

074 people
How many people: 74 people across 2 cited studies in people, drawn as one bar split into one block per study. The largest study holds 60 of them, 81 percent of the total.
People in each cited study in people
StudyPeopleShare
Nature Medicine 20246081%
EBioMedicine 20191419%

One study holds 81% of these people, so the total rests more on one study than its size suggests. Counts are the number of people each study on this page says it signed up. That includes studies that only watched people and gave nobody the compound. 2 more studies in people give no headcount and are not counted here. Studies still signing people up are left out, and only studies cited on this page are counted.

Fig. 1b · evidence mix

4 of 6 sources here are studies in people. The rest are not.

06 sources
  • Study in people · done in people467%
  • Animal study · done in animals233%

Counted from the list of sources on this page. It counts only what we cite, so there may be more studies out there. A review counts once, however many studies it sums up.

Fig. 2 · evidence over time

The studies cover 5 different years, 2015 to 2024, counted from the list of sources on this page.

Fig. 3 · legal status at a glance

Approved in all four countries shown. This is what the law says, not a verdict on the science. See Legal status below for the full text and any notes.

Fig. 5 · what the molecule is

Kind of compound
Small molecule
Molecule weight
488.0 Da
Half-life
About 4 hoursShort, 1 to 6 hours
Chain length
None on file

No amino acid sequence is on file for Dasatinib, which is expected: a small molecule is not built from amino acids.

The studies we cite

Common questions

Has Dasatinib been tested in people?

Yes. 74 people given it across 3 completed trials cited here, 1 of which found nothing. Dasatinib is an approved leukemia drug also tried, with quercetin, to clear worn-out cells. Early studies with no comparison group looked good. The proper studies that followed did not.

What is the Dasatinib dosage?

Approved medicine. No human dose established for unlabelled uses. Labeled amounts sit on the prescribing information. This page records what trials measured, not a personal dose. FDA-approved for leukemia; using it to clear out worn-out cells is off-label and investigational

Is Dasatinib FDA-approved?

FDA-approved for leukemia; using it to clear out worn-out cells is off-label and investigational

Is dasatinib safe to take for anti-aging?

It is a strong prescription cancer drug with real side effects. Using it to clear worn-out cells is experimental. In studies it was given in short bursts with a doctor watching. It is not a casual supplement.

Latest reading on Dasatinib

Blog posts about Dasatinib, newest first.

Compare Dasatinib with

Related compounds