Should selank or semax be cycled?
No careful study has tested a cycle length for either. In Russia, both are used as needed or as a set course for the uses they are approved for there. That is different from a repeating on and off cycle a user picks. Neither has published data on whether the body gets used to it with steady or repeated use.
Full cycling page: what was tested versus assumed
Studies in people from the compound pages this answer belongs to
- Selank
- Efficacy and possible mechanisms of action of a new peptide anxiolytic selank in the therapy of generalized anxiety disorders and neurasthenia 2008 PMID 18454096
- [A comparison of the anxiolytic effect and tolerability of selank and phenazepam in the treatment of anxiety disorders]. 2014 PMID 25176261
- [Optimization of the treatment of anxiety disorders with selank]. 2015 PMID 26356395
- Semax
- The efficacy of semax in the treatment of patients at different stages of ischemic stroke 2018 PMID 29798983
- [Effectiveness of semax in acute period of hemispheric ischemic stroke (a clinical and electrophysiological study)] 1997 PMID 11517472
- [Semax in prevention of disease progress and development of exacerbations in patients with cerebrovascular insufficiency] 2005 PMID 15792140
Educational use only. This database summarizes published research and is not medical advice. Where a dose appears it is a record of what a trial or clinic ran, or what people describe doing, with its source attached. Nothing here is a recommendation for personal use.
Part of cycling and clearance. Whether peptides need a break, what a half-life actually tells you, and where a real cycling mechanism has been measured. Full detail at /cycling.